Comments for PeteGoo http://blog.petegoo.com .Net Heebie Jeebies Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:21:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Workflow Service Tracking Viewer by Steve Goodman http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/10/02/workflow-service-tracking-viewer/#comment-438 Steve Goodman Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:21:03 +0000 http://blog.petegoo.com/?p=282#comment-438 <a href="#comment-437" rel="nofollow">@Steve Goodman </a> Doh, somehow missed the fact you could scroll the window left and right. What a great tool. Thank you. @Steve Goodman
Doh, somehow missed the fact you could scroll the window left and right. What a great tool. Thank you.

]]> Comment on Workflow Service Tracking Viewer by Steve Goodman http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/10/02/workflow-service-tracking-viewer/#comment-437 Steve Goodman Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:34:33 +0000 http://blog.petegoo.com/?p=282#comment-437 Another great post. Is there anyway that the DisplayName could be outputted? Another great post. Is there anyway that the DisplayName could be outputted?

]]> Comment on Workflow Service Tracking Viewer by Mike Perrenoud http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/10/02/workflow-service-tracking-viewer/#comment-436 Mike Perrenoud Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:57:30 +0000 http://blog.petegoo.com/?p=282#comment-436 Pete -- amazing tool and post, simply amazing! WF is a great platform and has some awesome benefits but debugging has always been weak. I've written software for more than 11 years and have never been so excited for simply text style logging with artifact names and stack traces. I appreciate your willingness to contribute to the community, it's greatly appreciated and has likely saved me days of debugging. Great job! Pete — amazing tool and post, simply amazing! WF is a great platform and has some awesome benefits but debugging has always been weak. I’ve written software for more than 11 years and have never been so excited for simply text style logging with artifact names and stack traces. I appreciate your willingness to contribute to the community, it’s greatly appreciated and has likely saved me days of debugging. Great job!

]]> Comment on Workflow Service Tracking Viewer by (WF4 – Link) For your reading pleasure – PeteGoo | MSDN Blogs http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/10/02/workflow-service-tracking-viewer/#comment-434 (WF4 – Link) For your reading pleasure – PeteGoo | MSDN Blogs Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:57:48 +0000 http://blog.petegoo.com/?p=282#comment-434 [...] http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/10/02/workflow-service-tracking-viewer/ [...] [...] http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/10/02/workflow-service-tracking-viewer/ [...]

]]> Comment on Building an Enterprise Workflow system with WF4 by (WF4 – Link) For your reading pleasure – PeteGoo | MSDN Blogs http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/09/02/building-an-enterprise-workflow-system-with-wf4/#comment-433 (WF4 – Link) For your reading pleasure – PeteGoo | MSDN Blogs Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:57:29 +0000 http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/09/02/building-an-enterprise-workflow-system-with-wf4/#comment-433 [...] http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/09/02/building-an-enterprise-workflow-system-with-wf4/ (post # 1 series of 4 posts) [...] [...] http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/09/02/building-an-enterprise-workflow-system-with-wf4/ (post # 1 series of 4 posts) [...]

]]> Comment on Responding to WF completion using the Creation Context by PeteGoo http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/09/23/responding-to-wf-completion-using-the-creation-context/#comment-431 PeteGoo Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:42:52 +0000 http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/09/23/responding-to-wf-completion-using-the-creation-context/#comment-431 Have you perhaps created a CreationContext class that could not be serialized? You can write a test for it by using the DataContractSerializer class, or feel free to send me the code (I'll ping you an email so you have my address). Normally this can happen if you have not left a parameterless constructor on your type or if it has some type of unserializable property on it. Have you perhaps created a CreationContext class that could not be serialized? You can write a test for it by using the DataContractSerializer class, or feel free to send me the code (I’ll ping you an email so you have my address).

Normally this can happen if you have not left a parameterless constructor on your type or if it has some type of unserializable property on it.

]]> Comment on Responding to WF completion using the Creation Context by Kedrick Weeks http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/09/23/responding-to-wf-completion-using-the-creation-context/#comment-430 Kedrick Weeks Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:22:56 +0000 http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/09/23/responding-to-wf-completion-using-the-creation-context/#comment-430 Hi, I've managed to use this blog series to build a sample workflow service (different from this) and I'm able to host the workflow and consume the service from the WCF TestClient. However, the service doesn't execute my workflow... In fact, it doesn't call the OnBeginWorkflowCompleted... it simply returns the object I'm sending to the service and whatever modification I make in the WorkflowHostingEndpoint class. I read that there's a flag that needs to be set in the WorkflowCreationContext object that indicates whether to execute the OnBeginWorkflowCompleted method and that flag isn't set when initialized in the OnGetCreationContext methods... I'd appreciate any guidance as to why my workflow activity isn't being called by the service. Thanks! KBW Hi,

I’ve managed to use this blog series to build a sample workflow service (different from this) and I’m able to host the workflow and consume the service from the WCF TestClient. However, the service doesn’t execute my workflow…

In fact, it doesn’t call the OnBeginWorkflowCompleted… it simply returns the object I’m sending to the service and whatever modification I make in the WorkflowHostingEndpoint class.

I read that there’s a flag that needs to be set in the WorkflowCreationContext object that indicates whether to execute the OnBeginWorkflowCompleted method and that flag isn’t set when initialized in the OnGetCreationContext methods…

I’d appreciate any guidance as to why my workflow activity isn’t being called by the service.

Thanks!
KBW

]]> Comment on Building an Auto Complete control with Reactive Extensions (Rx) by Paul Betts http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/11/22/building-an-auto-complete-control-with-reactive-extensions-rx/#comment-374 Paul Betts Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:47:58 +0000 http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/11/22/building-an-auto-complete-control-with-reactive-extensions-rx/#comment-374 Great post! If you want to take these ideas a step further, check out ReactiveUI - it makes the types of things you're doing a bit cleaner since it removes many of the FromEventPatterns, as well as gives you an ICommand that works similarly to your ReactiveRelayCommand (though ICommand gets even more powerful when you start defining the CanExecute in terms of IObservable and you can relate CanExecute to the values of properties). If you think it's cool, let me know, and if you think it's lame, *definitely* let me know, as I'm working on making a rearchitected version for Win8 and I would love to hear what people like / don't like about RxUI. Great post! If you want to take these ideas a step further, check out ReactiveUI – it makes the types of things you’re doing a bit cleaner since it removes many of the FromEventPatterns, as well as gives you an ICommand that works similarly to your ReactiveRelayCommand (though ICommand gets even more powerful when you start defining the CanExecute in terms of IObservable and you can relate CanExecute to the values of properties).

If you think it’s cool, let me know, and if you think it’s lame, *definitely* let me know, as I’m working on making a rearchitected version for Win8 and I would love to hear what people like / don’t like about RxUI.

]]> Comment on Arghhh! Simultaneous Connection Limit in IIS (Windows 7) by PeteGoo http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/11/10/arghhh-simultaneous-connection-limit-in-iis-windows-7/#comment-365 PeteGoo Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:35:57 +0000 http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/11/10/arghhh-simultaneous-connection-limit-in-iis-windows-7/#comment-365 Hi, yes I was sure it would work awesomely on server.It's just that we have dev tools for our clients for whom we'll have to come up with another solution. Hi, yes I was sure it would work awesomely on server.It’s just that we have dev tools for our clients for whom we’ll have to come up with another solution.

]]> Comment on Arghhh! Simultaneous Connection Limit in IIS (Windows 7) by Mario http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/11/10/arghhh-simultaneous-connection-limit-in-iis-windows-7/#comment-364 Mario Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:29:49 +0000 http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/11/10/arghhh-simultaneous-connection-limit-in-iis-windows-7/#comment-364 Did you try calling IIS 7 on a WinServer ? I reached 40,000 thousands conns calling from an 8 logical cores client (laptop) to an 24 logical cores with Win Srv 2008 R2 ... and i did not complete my tests yet ! :-) Did you try calling IIS 7 on a WinServer ? I reached 40,000 thousands conns calling from an 8 logical cores client (laptop) to an 24 logical cores with Win Srv 2008 R2 … and i did not complete my tests yet ! :-)

]]>